| General Information: |
|
| Name(s) found: |
YMR099C
[SGD]
|
| Description(s) found:
Found 31 descriptions. SHOW ALL |
|
| Organism: | Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
| Length: | 297 amino acids |
Gene Ontology: |
|
| Cellular Component: |
nucleus
[IDA ]
cytoplasm [IDA ]
|
| Biological Process: |
carbohydrate metabolic process
[IC]
|
| Molecular Function: |
glucose-6-phosphate 1-epimerase activity
[IDA]
|
| Sequence: |
|
| Sequence: [PDR BLAST] [ProtParam] |
1 11 21 31 41 51
| | | | | |
1 MPIKETDKEV VLTHPADETT SVHILKYGAT VYSWKLKSEE QLWLSTAAKL DGSKPVRGGI 60
61 PLVFPVFGKN STDEHLSKLP QHGLARNSTW EFLGQTKENP PTVQFGLKPE IANPELTKLW 120
121 PMDYLLILTV ELGSDYLKTA IEVENTSSSK ELKFNWLFHT YFRIEDIEGT MVSNLAGMKL 180
181 YDQLLKESYV DKHPVVTFNQ ETDVIYQNVS AERAIQIVDK GVQIHTLKRY NLPDTVVWNP 240
241 WIEKSQGMAD FEPKTGYQQM ICIEPGHVHD FISLAPGKKW NAYQLLCKEE LKYQAIQ |
| PUBLICATION | TOPOLOGY | COCOMPLEXED PROTEINS | |
| View Details | Riffle et al. (2010) (Unpublished Data) |
|
NUC1 YMR099C |
| View Details | Hazbun TR, et al. (2003) |
|
NUC1 TRZ1 YMR099C |
| View Details | Gavin AC, et al. (2006) |
|
NUC1 TRZ1 YMR099C |
The following runs contain data for this protein:
| BAIT | COMMENTS | PUBLICATION | |
| View Run | No Comments | Hazbun TR, et al. (2003) | |
| View Run | No Comments | Hazbun TR, et al. (2003) | |
| View Run | #32 Asynchronous Prep-No Phosphopeptide enrichment | Keck JM, et al. (2011) |
SHOWING SINGLE HITS. [ Hide Single Hits ]
| BAIT | PREY | HITS | PUBLICATION | |
| View Screen | 2 | Unpublished Fields Lab Data |
New Feature: Upload Your Own Microscopy Data
| PROTEIN(S) | PUBLICATION | |
| View Data |
|
Hazbun TR, et al. (2003) |
| View Data |
|
Unpublished Data |
| View Data |
|
Huh WK, et al. (2003) |
Domains predicted:
| # | Region(s) | Method | Confidence | Match Description | |
| 1 | View Details | [1..199] |  |
6.0 | Galactose mutarotase |
| 2 | View Details | [200..297] | |
N/A | No confident structure predictions are available. |
| Protein predicted to be: | GLOBULAR (No transmembrane regions or signal peptide) |
| Confidence of classification: | 0.99 |
Source: Reynolds et al. (2008)