| General Information: |
|
| Name(s) found: |
RFM1 /
YOR279C
[SGD]
|
| Description(s) found:
Found 27 descriptions. SHOW ALL |
|
| Organism: | Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
| Length: | 310 amino acids |
Gene Ontology: |
|
| Cellular Component: |
nucleus
[IPI ]
histone deacetylase complex [IPI ]
|
| Biological Process: |
telomere maintenance
[IMP]
chromatin silencing [IGI ][IMP][IPI]
|
| Molecular Function: |
unfolded protein binding
[IGI][IMP][IPI]
|
| Sequence: |
|
| Sequence: [PDR BLAST] [ProtParam] |
1 11 21 31 41 51
| | | | | |
1 MSTNTEIIKN SDLQSLINDK RRLINEIKDF NKSIKPLEFE SYQDYFLIKT FKKGISASGH 60
61 VDIDSLRNKE YGIYYKKIKR NSTQEVGEPI PRNTSSSSSS TRSNSSADIS DTEYSGENTP 120
121 TTTGAASRRR RTRSRAIQRE NSLPASLPSI SEANANNDDV TISEINGSEL PFPIPISEVE 180
181 NIDIASDITE RDGIRRRSSR ISERDKRRSQ SRLGSEEDEE GDGHDGDEGE TKIQDLYESL 240
241 VPKILESRRR SDWILPPKAR YTPEKQMRTK PSFKSIKINE LVGNKRIRSI LSRFEGGVAG 300
301 IRKRDWDSTQ |
| PUBLICATION | TOPOLOGY | COCOMPLEXED PROTEINS | |
| View Details | Riffle et al. (2010) (Unpublished Data) |
|
RFM1 SUM1 |
| View Details | Krogan NJ, et al. (2006) |
|
AKL1 HOS4 HST1 RFM1 SET3 SIF2 SNT1 SUM1 |
The following runs contain data for this protein:
| BAIT | COMMENTS | PUBLICATION | |
| View Run | #32 Asynchronous Prep-No Phosphopeptide enrichment | Keck JM, et al. (2011) |
SHOWING SINGLE HITS. [ Hide Single Hits ]
| BAIT | PREY | HITS | PUBLICATION | |
| View Screen | 1 | Unpublished Fields Lab Data | ||
| View Screen | 1 | Unpublished Fields Lab Data | ||
| View Screen | 1 | Unpublished Fields Lab Data | ||
| View Screen | 1 | Unpublished Fields Lab Data |
New Feature: Upload Your Own Microscopy Data
| PROTEIN(S) | PUBLICATION | |
| View Data |
|
Huh WK, et al. (2003) |
Domains predicted:
| # | Region(s) | Method | Confidence | Match Description | |
| 1 | View Details | [1..68] |  |
N/A | No confident structure predictions are available. |
| 2 | View Details | [69..310] | |
7.72 | No description for 1ej6B was found. |
| Protein predicted to be: | GLOBULAR (No transmembrane regions or signal peptide) |
| Confidence of classification: | 0.99 |
Source: Reynolds et al. (2008)